Re: OS version for driver

From: "Mihai Gheorghiu" <tanethq(at)earthlink(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OS version for driver
Date: 2001-09-26 19:03:45
Message-ID: 01d501c146bd$fbffe7a0$6e646464@New6.Travel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Thanks, everybody!

-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
To: Mihai Gheorghiu <tanethq(at)earthlink(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Date: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:38 PM
Subject: Re: OS version for driver

>The jdbc driver is OS independent. It doesn't matter which platform the
>driver is compiled on, it will run on any platform that supports a java
>runtime.
>
>As far as jdk1.2 vs jdk1.3 goes, a driver compiled by a 1.2 jdk will
>work fine under jdk1.3. The code is identical for these two jdk
>releases. If you are using jdk1.1 (and thus jdbc1) you will need to use
>a version specifically compiled for jdk1.1 (although it to should still
>run under a 1.2 or 1.3 jdk, however you will not be able to use any
>jdbc2 methods since they are not part of the code that is built under
>jdk1.1).
>
>thanks,
>--Barry
>
>
>
>Mihai Gheorghiu wrote:
>
>> The most recent driver on jdbc.fastcrypt.com is 9/24; it is compiled on
>> RH7.0
>> The most recent rpm for PG is 8/17, compiled on RH7.1.
>> Is there a location where I can find it compiled on RH7.1 (and Sun
jdk1.3)?
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>>
>>
>
>

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2001-09-26 20:28:24 Re: JDBC update wont, plz help.
Previous Message Barry Lind 2001-09-26 17:45:56 Re: OS version for driver