Re: AW: Re: [SQL] behavior of ' = NULL' vs. MySQL vs. Stand ards

From: "Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AW: Re: [SQL] behavior of ' = NULL' vs. MySQL vs. Stand ards
Date: 2001-06-18 20:06:40
Message-ID: 01d201c0f832$309b6f00$48d210ac@jecw2k1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I assume you are just looking for review at this point; I would not
> recommend applying to CVS until the BooleanTest part is done too.
> (Since parsetree changes affect stored rules, the change really should
> include a catversion.h increment, and thus it's best to bunch this sort
> of change together to avoid forcing extra initdbs on other hackers.)
> I'll look through the code later, but...

OK -- I'll get started on BooleanTest in the next day or two.

-- Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-06-18 20:17:00 Re: LEFT JOIN ...
Previous Message Cary O'Brien 2001-06-18 20:05:53 Index files grow forever?