From: | "Jordan Henderson" <jordan_henders(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Greg Copeland" <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net> |
Cc: | "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, "Don Baccus" <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, "PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Curt Sampson" <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |
Date: | 2002-08-08 14:42:37 |
Message-ID: | 01d101c23ee9$d96d0d60$19c58cac@innerakt |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg,
Well put, I can't agree more. I think even the horse has gotten up and
left.
I think what would be useful is to discuss the theory part. When we go down
that path, we should all be referring to a consistent set of references.
There by we can have a common ground from which to talk. In that spirit, I
would offer up the following references:
- Date has 3, however his most current work is dated 2000, The Third
Manifesto SECOND EDITION.
-There is the work done by Dr Kim, perhaps 'Modern Database Systems, The
Object Model, Interoperability, and Beyond'.
- Silberschatz, Korth, Sudarshan, A book I am sure we have all read,
Database System Concepts - Third Edition.
In any case, we should use the current editions of these books, not
something the author has reconsidered, re-written, and published again.
Jordan Henderson
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Copeland" <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>
To: "Curt Sampson" <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>
Cc: "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>; "Don Baccus" <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>;
"PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Copeland | 2002-08-08 15:59:55 | Re: Another python patch -- minor |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-08-08 14:40:57 | Re: How the |