| From: | "Hiroshi Saito" <saito(at)inetrt(dot)skcapi(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Adam H(dot) Pendleton" <fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: gcc ignoring defined macros? |
| Date: | 2003-10-06 19:51:07 |
| Message-ID: | 01ce01c38c43$2f3bc6d0$1f324d80@w2k |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Hi Adam.
IMHO,
libpq (PostgreSQL) becomes Non SSL if designation (--with-openssl) isn't done.
It isn't used even if it has SSL-Library.
Because libpq is used, pgAdmin3 is thought to be an option.
However,
I think that we will force to use it.
regards,
Hiroshi Saito
From: Adam H. Pendleton
(snip)
> I was about to fix this, when I realized that I was about to add -DSSL to the command-line for *all*
> situations. Is this what we want,
> or is this supposed to be a conditional compile option?
> If it's needed for *all* situations, then why included it at all,
> why not just >remove the #ifdefs and always compile the SSL code?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-10-06 22:20:07 | Re: CVS compile error |
| Previous Message | Adam H. Pendleton | 2003-10-06 18:24:03 | CVS compile error |