Re: PG Admin

From: Bob Pawley <rjpawley(at)shaw(dot)ca>
To: aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, Raymond O'Donnell <rod(at)iol(dot)ie>
Subject: Re: PG Admin
Date: 2006-12-05 04:08:30
Message-ID: 01c901c71823$060aedd0$8e904618@owner
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

The physical devices don't get numbered until the design is established and
stable. This is known as the construction stage.

Bob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Klaver" <aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Bob Pawley" <rjpawley(at)shaw(dot)ca>; "Scott Marlowe"
<smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>; "Raymond O'Donnell" <rod(at)iol(dot)ie>
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PG Admin

> On Monday 04 December 2006 04:17 pm, Bob Pawley wrote:
>> Your missing the point.
>>
>> I am creating a design system for industrial control.
>>
>> The control devices need to be numbered. The numbers need to be
>> sequential.
>> If the user deletes a device the numbers need to regenerate to again
>> become
>> sequential and gapless.
>>
>> Bob
> I am trying to figure how you keep track of the physical devices. Do they
> get
> renumbered also?
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/
>

In response to

Responses

  • Re: PG Admin at 2006-12-05 05:07:39 from Michael Glaesemann

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guy Rouillier 2006-12-05 04:34:41 [Fwd: Re: PG Admin]
Previous Message Bob Pawley 2006-12-05 04:06:49 Re: PG Admin