| From: | "SC Altex Impex SRL" <office(dot)Altex(at)decebal(dot)ro> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql questions" <pgsql-questions(at)hub(dot)org>, "pgsql hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Subject: | lock failed and buffer leak |
| Date: | 1998-04-17 07:16:19 |
| Message-ID: | 01bd69d0$b832e860$0300010a@claudiu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
testing the (postgresql 6.3.1 included) jdbc ImageViewer example.
It works. No errors.
But in the pgsql log I fond these (actually many more):
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
Apr 17 10:08:02 digital logger: NOTICE: DateStyle is Postgres with US
(NonEuropean) conventions
Apr 17 10:08:07 digital logger: NOTICE: buffer leak [65] detected in
BufferPoolCheckLeak()
Apr 17 10:08:07 digital logger: NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup
failed, no lock
Apr 17 10:08:07 digital logger: NOTICE: buffer leak [75] detected in
BufferPoolCheckLeak()
Apr 17 10:08:08 digital logger: NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup
failed, no lock
Apr 17 10:08:47 digital logger: NOTICE: buffer leak [65] detected in
BufferPoolCheckLeak()
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
what do they mean ?
Claudiu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | SC Altex Impex SRL | 1998-04-17 08:47:01 | pgsql 6.3 vs 6.3.1 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-04-17 04:12:28 | Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release |