From: | "David Johnston" <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'salah jubeh'" <s_jubeh(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "'pgsql'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: strange result with union |
Date: | 2012-03-21 15:31:58 |
Message-ID: | 01b901cd0777$c13570a0$43a051e0$@yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thus view1 must be returning 3 pairs of duplicate rows which are then being
combined into 3 individual rows during the de-duplication pass.
Dave J.
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of salah jubeh
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 11:26 AM
To: pgsql
Subject: [GENERAL] strange result with union
Hello,
Today, I have encounterd a strange result and I want to trace it but I do
not know how. I have two views having union as in q3. q1 returns 236 rows,
q2 returns 0 rows. I expected q3 to return 236 rows but I get 233 ...
q1: select * FROM view1 -- reurns 236 rows
q2: select * FROM view2 -- returns 0 rows
q3: select * FROM view1 union select * FROM view2 --returns 233 rows
q4: select * FROM view1 union all select * FROM view2 --returns 236 rows
I knwo that the union operator filter out duplicate rows but the intresting
part is that view2 returns 0 rows.
If I use UNION all I get the expected result which is 236 rows. I am almost
sure that view1 defenesion is dependent of view2 defnesion. for example I
can drop view2 without droping view1. and I can drop view1 without dropping
view2.
I am running on version "PostgreSQL 8.3.12 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled
by GCC gcc-4.3.real (Debian 4.3.2-1.1) 4.3.2"
Regards
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | salah jubeh | 2012-03-21 15:57:08 | Re: strange result with union |
Previous Message | salah jubeh | 2012-03-21 15:25:30 | strange result with union |