From: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | itishree sukla <itishree(dot)sukla(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Check Pointer |
Date: | 2013-06-07 08:19:58 |
Message-ID: | 01DB5926A90B9B3C23626456@apophis.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
--On 30. Mai 2013 18:15:04 +0530 itishree sukla <itishree(dot)sukla(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response. Below is the out put of Top Commnd.
>
> 3971 postgres 20 0 8048m 303m 301m S 0 0.9 0:04.34
> /usr/lib/postgresql/9.2/bin/postgres -D /var/lib/postgresql/9.2/main -c
> config_file=/etc/postgre
> 3972 postgres 20 0 66828 1820 708 S 0 0.0 1:36.37
> postgres: logger
> process
>
>
> 3974 postgres 20 0 8054m 7.6g 7.6g S 0 24.1 0:56.59
> postgres: checkpointer
> process
>
On Linux i often find the pmap utility a far better tool to get an idea
what a process
actually consumes of memory. The output can be large sometimes, but it's
more "fine grained".
--
Thanks
Bernd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matheus de Oliveira | 2013-06-07 13:53:14 | Re: Check Pointer |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-06-06 12:53:18 | Re: Check Pointer |