RE: SQL article

Yes.

My apologies,

Mike Mascari
mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com

-----Original Message-----
From: John Burski [SMTP:John(dot)Burski(at)911ep(dot)com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 2:10 PM
To: PostgreSQL-general
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SQL article

If you read through to the bottom of the second page of the article and
follow the "continue" link, you'll find that he does mention PostgreSQL
and compares (rather favorably, IMHO) it to Access, MySQL, and Oracle.
He even indicates that he is going to be focusing on PostgreSQL in a
future article.

Mike Mascari wrote:

> Kind of annoying that under "Related:" there aren't any PostgreSQL links though.
>
> Mike Mascari
> mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [SMTP:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 12:36 PM
> To: PostgreSQL-documentation
> Cc: PostgreSQL-general
> Subject: [GENERAL] SQL article
>
> This was an interesting introduction to SQL:
>
> http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/linux/2000/10/20/aboutSQL_1.html
>

--
John Burski
Chief I.T. Cook and Bottlewasher
911 Emergency Products, St. Cloud, MN
(320) 656 0076 www.911ep.com