| From: | Nicolas Huillard <nhuillard(at)ghs(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org>, "pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org" <pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |
| Date: | 2000-01-28 22:31:34 |
| Message-ID: | 01BF69E7.D17FF8D0@agen.int.ghs |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
A little adjustment : SOME queries work with the new binary and the old indexes. Many other don't, as Tom and Hiroshi figured.
With a new binary and after reloding the DB, every seems to work correctly.
Nicolas Huillard
-----Message d'origine-----
De: Nicolas Huillard [SMTP:nhuillard(at)ghs(dot)fr]
Date: vendredi 28 janvier 2000 22:42
À: pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org; pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org
Objet: RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4
Thank to everybody, I recompiled Postgres and tested it on the same DB : the offending SELECT worked, without any index regeneration. Maybe the order in which the items where inserted in the table (using COPY, before creating the index) made it working.
...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Graeme Merrall | 2000-01-29 00:09:38 | Quick function question |
| Previous Message | Nicolas Huillard | 2000-01-28 21:41:43 | RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Roland Roberts | 2000-01-29 04:22:54 | Help with pl/pgsql, triggers, and foreign keys |
| Previous Message | Nicolas Huillard | 2000-01-28 21:41:43 | RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |