From: | "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: MS-VC build patch |
Date: | 2006-06-26 17:34:58 |
Message-ID: | 019801c69946$d8d36190$0d01a8c0@yourc3ftrhkaod |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Umm, It is strange.. I think that you have another config.h.?
I look at much error by the reason for being realistic.
I will become on tomorrow night, since I am not in the machine
which can work now.
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
From: "Magnus Hagander"
> Hi Bruce-san.
>
> It does not help me yet. He uses VC2005.:-( It seems that
> furthermore, it is still in the middle of work.
> One problem is visible to the next.(win32.mak)
> + if not exist pg_config_os.h copy port\win32.h pg_config_os.h
> If VC6+ is still supported, I will submit the patch again.
> What I patch has built both the client and the server by VC6+.
I don't think there's anything specific in my patch that should kill
VC6. What specifically does not work in VC6?
(Just reverting the whole patch doesn't seem right to me...)
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-06-26 17:58:23 | Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-26 17:32:04 | Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 |