From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Version Numbering |
Date: | 2010-08-20 21:17:39 |
Message-ID: | 01964b38242e1599090eb2c6313976ba@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
David Wheeler:
> No idea what you mean by that, but generally it's a bad idea
> to switch from dotted-integer version numbers and numeric
> version numbers. See Perl (Quel dsastre!).
Yeah, I think Perl is a prime example of how NOT to handle
version numbering. :) I think we got it right the first time.
David Fetter:
> "We're using Postgre 8"
>
> See also all the flocks of tools that claim to support "Postgres 8"
Flocks? Handful at best, and no reason we should be catering to
their inaccuracies.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201008201713
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAkxu8NkACgkQvJuQZxSWSsgNVACfYko/YC7SOlMXpavO7JXWSZhp
i7QAoKmPKvNlASLAYfimtnrpg0lk82vh
=aWSL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Aidan Van Dyk | 2010-08-20 21:22:00 | Re: Version Numbering |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-20 21:10:09 | Re: Version Numbering |