Re: Hard problem with concurrency

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hard problem with concurrency
Date: 2003-02-19 01:30:20
Message-ID: 019201c2d7b6$77411990$6500a8c0@fhp.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > REPLACE INTO anyone? ;)
>
> The upcoming SQL 200x standard includes a MERGE command that appears to
> fulfill that purpose.

Is there somewhere that I can read that spec?

Or can you just post the MERGE syntax for us?

*sigh* It's just like a standard to come up with a totally new syntax for a
feature that no-one has except MySQL who use a different syntax :)

Thanks,

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-02-19 01:38:51 Re: Hard problem with concurrency
Previous Message Bruce Badger 2003-02-19 01:13:39 Real-world usage example