Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
Date: 2022-06-21 21:11:33
Message-ID: 018c0370-9e82-8b78-cd00-1fdea0c6811c@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2022-06-17 Fr 16:06, Andres Freund wrote:
>
>
> I also attached my heavily-WIP patches for the ExprEvalStep issues,

Many thanks

> I
> accidentally had only included a small part of the contents of the json fix.
>

Yeah, that confused me mightily last week :-)

I and a couple of colleagues have looked it over. As far as it goes the
json fix looks kosher to me. I'll play with it some more.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-06-21 21:25:16 Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2022-06-21 20:24:14 Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15