Re: Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem

From: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
To: "mlw" <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Date: 2001-05-18 04:36:36
Message-ID: 018c01c0df54$20f8b130$0401010a@zeut
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Also, it would be good to be able to update the statistics without doing a
> vacuum, i.e. rather than having to vacuum to analyze, being able to
analyze
> without a vacuum.
>
I was going to ask the same thing. In a lot of situations (insert
dominated) vacumm analyze is more important for the update of statistics
then for recovery of space. Could we roll that into this? Or should we
also have an Analyze daemon?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2001-05-18 04:45:14 Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2001-05-18 04:04:42 Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem