Re: Bison 2.1 on win32

From: "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "PGSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bison 2.1 on win32
Date: 2007-03-17 19:23:58
Message-ID: 018801c768c9$cfdc6070$0b01a8c0@yourc3ftrhkaod
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi.

I was operating in a tentative way by 2.3.
Still, it is not sufficient. However, it moves.
I will think that I am glad, if it can adjust with Magnus.
http://winpg.jp/~saito/MinGW/bison-2.3_win32_src.tgz

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "PGSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bison 2.1 on win32

> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> Do you happen to have a 2.2 around so you can see what happens there? Or
>> does someone else have that? So I know which version to test against...
>
> 2.2 and 2.3 seem to use _MSC_VER in the same way. I had occasion to
> test both last fall, and they generate only trivially different
> outputs from our grammar.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-03-17 20:28:53 Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2007-03-17 19:14:03 Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT (was Question: pg_classattributes and race conditions ?)