From: | "Ets ROLLAND" <ets(at)rolland-fr(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Riccardo Inverni" <riccardo(dot)inverni(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go? |
Date: | 2006-05-31 07:16:34 |
Message-ID: | 018701c68482$26dc1410$6400a8c0@lrp43210 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello,
3 weeks ago I install a PostgreSQL 8.1.3 server on Windows 2003 server standar edition.
The box is a NEC express5800 TM800 with 4 SATA/300 250 Gb 7200 rpm in RAID10 (0+1).
It works fine, faster than the old server ALTOS with SCSI-3 disks Ultra160 10000 rpm.
I upgraded to 8.1.4.
The embded RAID controler is based on an Intel chipset.
SATA seem convenient.
Luc
----- Original Message -----
From: Riccardo Inverni
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 11:28 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] SCSI disk: still the way to go?
Hi guys,
I have to update a Linux box with PostgreSQL on it, essentially for data warehousing purposes. I had set it up about 3 years ago and at that time the best solution I had been recommended was to use SCSI disks with hardware RAID controllers.
Is this still the way to go or things have recently changed? Any other suggestion/advice? What about SAN?
Thanks.
Cheers,
Riccardo
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Berislav Lopac | 2006-05-31 07:26:02 | Re: Restoring databases from a different installment on Windows |
Previous Message | Pit Müller | 2006-05-31 07:12:52 | Problem in Pg 8.1.4 with CREATEDB |