Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?
Date: 2009-10-25 20:38:58
Message-ID: 01841001080ea2fa60443775653b5255@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> There is a SQL standard for this, and other DBMS look like they found a way
>
> How come it can not be done ?

It *can* be done, but it won't be done. At least not by default. You might
get better traction if you perhaps argue for a flag to pg_dump to
exhibit the behavior you want. It has a small chance of being accepted,
but a much greater chance than changing the default behavior.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200910251638
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkrkt2oACgkQvJuQZxSWSshyYwCcCRozshAfS22KtJJqoLmJdOsx
X9IAmwYedkEyw819R6P0FZXVgskefaR4
=4oy5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Timothy Madden 2009-10-25 20:43:54 Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2009-10-25 18:49:05 Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?