| From: | "David Wall" <d(dot)wall(at)computer(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Vacuum analyze in 7.1.1 |
| Date: | 2001-06-14 04:01:08 |
| Message-ID: | 016901c0f486$a6372240$5a2b7ad8@expertrade.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-interfaces |
The new vacuum comments are much more clear. Bravo.
As for the large objects, I'll have to see what happens when I delete a row
that contains a large object. Sounds like they are not being deleted for me
as I had thought. That's too bad since I know it must be a common problem
for those who use them. I use the JDBC library, so I don't really even
create the large objects except through standard JDBC calls like
PreparedStatement.setBytes(). I'll have to see if JDBC does an unlink
anywhere.
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Wall | 2001-06-14 04:15:28 | Re: Vacuum analyze in 7.1.1 |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-06-14 02:42:49 | 7.1.2-4PGDG RPMset uploading. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Wall | 2001-06-14 04:15:28 | Re: Vacuum analyze in 7.1.1 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-14 01:17:11 | Re: Vacuum analyze in 7.1.1 |