Re: Red Hat DB announced - why not PostgreSQL?

What makes you think it isn't postgreSQL? Some people are saying that it is.

Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Rossi" <adam(dot)rossi(at)platinumsolutions(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 3:39 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] Red Hat DB announced - why not PostgreSQL?

> It looks like Red Hat has announced an open source database called Red Hat
> Database:
>
> (via slashdot:)
>
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/20010619/tc/red_hat_to_play_in_oracle_s_aren
a_1.html
>
> Why is this not PostgreSQL? Why can't the Red Hat folks sell support to
> PostgreSQL, rather than developing another open source database and
> supporting that? Is it a conflict with GreatBridge? This looks like it
could
> have been a great opportunity for PostgreSQL....
>
> - Adam
>
> --
> Adam Rossi
> President, PlatinumSolutions, Inc.
> adam(dot)rossi(at)platinumsolutions(dot)com
> http://www.platinumsolutions.com
> P.O. Box 31 Oakton, VA 22124
> PH: 703.471.9793 FAX: 703.471.7140
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>