Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8 for Win32 -- installation problem

From: "Hiroshi Saito" <saito(at)inetrt(dot)skcapi(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Randolf Richardson" <rr(at)8x(dot)ca>, <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8 for Win32 -- installation problem
Date: 2005-01-10 16:20:35
Message-ID: 014901c4f730$50b7f320$1f324d80@w2k
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

Dear All.

Thank you for the various information.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>

> I don't think so, but it's probably a good idea to include a readme.txt
> file in the next ZIP file that states that it's the japanese version,
> and should only be used on japanese systems.

I mention README.txt which will be read first, and so I will try to explain
it in english and Japanese.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>

> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Perhaps also the filename should be "-jp" not "-ja"? I agree with
> > the complainant that the former is more standard.
>
> ja = Japanese (ISO 639 language code)
> jp = Japan (ISO 3166 country code)
>
> Since the installation pack is probably targeted at users speaking
> Japanese, much like the "en" installer targets users speaking English,
> "ja" seems to be correct.

I like the language specification, too.

best regards,
Hiroshi Saito

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-01-10 16:37:30 Re: "SMgrRelation hashtable corrupted" failure identified
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-01-10 16:20:17 Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jani Averbach 2005-01-13 18:21:59 Build report: Gentoo Linux, amd64/SMP
Previous Message Mark Rae 2005-01-10 12:26:49 Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 4