Re: Stack Depth

From: Bob Pawley <rjpawley(at)shaw(dot)ca>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Bricklen Anderson <banderson(at)presinet(dot)com>
Cc: Postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Stack Depth
Date: 2006-02-02 01:04:22
Message-ID: 014501c62794$9aad0070$ac1d4318@owner
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks all

I do think I have a recursive problem. It's just hard to see at the moment.

Bob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Fuhr" <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: "Bricklen Anderson" <banderson(at)presinet(dot)com>
Cc: "Bob Pawley" <rjpawley(at)shaw(dot)ca>; "Postgresql"
<pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Stack Depth

> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 03:48:38PM -0800, Bricklen Anderson wrote:
>> Bob Pawley wrote:
>> >I understand the default stack depth is about 2 meg. How do I determine
>> >what the stack depth should be so that I avoid this error?
>>
>> check max_stack_depth in your postgresql.conf file
>
> Before mucking with max_stack_depth, investigate whether the triggers
> are causing infinite recursion (an insert fires a trigger, which
> does an insert, which fires a trigger, which does an insert, ad
> infinitum). If that's happening then increasing the stack depth
> will merely prolong the agony.
>
> --
> Michael Fuhr
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2006-02-02 01:22:13 Re: Stack Depth
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2006-02-02 00:52:26 Re: Stack Depth