| From: | "Markus KARG" <markus(at)headcrashing(dot)eu> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'List'" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: |
| Date: | 2015-06-30 20:15:08 |
| Message-ID: | 013c01d0b371$760c2c50$622484f0$@eu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Yes, sure, but having a strategy in-between at least adds room to do LRU by hand in case we don't want to shade more and more third party dependencies thanks to pgjdbc's apparent no-dependency policy.
-----Original Message-----
From: Vladimir Sitnikov [mailto:sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: Dienstag, 30. Juni 2015 20:05
To: Markus KARG
Cc: List
Subject:
There should be some implementation behind that "strategy" anyway.
BTW. CLHM implements java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentMap, so I think it
is a safe interface for replacement in the future (e.g. to
https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine when we have jdk8-minimum
builds)
Vladimir
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steven Schlansker | 2015-06-30 20:16:46 | Re: SQLJSON |
| Previous Message | Markus KARG | 2015-06-30 20:04:50 | Re: SQLJSON |