Re: 2-phase commit

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD [mailto:ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at]
> >
> > Example:
> >
> > Master Slave
> > ------ -----
> > commit ready-->
>
> This is the commit for phase 1. This commit is allowed to return all
> sorts of errors, like violated deferred checks, out of diskspace, ...
>
> > <--OK
> > commit done->XX
>
> This is commit for phase 2, the slave *must* answer with "success"
> in all but hardware failure cases. (Note that instead the
> master could
> instead send rollback, e.g. because some other slave aborted)
>
> > is the "commit done" message needed ?
>
> So, yes this is needed

Thanks.
I misunderstood that the "commit done" message is the last response from
the participant to the coordinator. I missed the "OK" message before it.
Where were my eyes ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue