Re: We have a requirement to downgrade from PostgreSQL 9.5.4 to 9.5.2

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>, KGA Official <kga(dot)official(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: We have a requirement to downgrade from PostgreSQL 9.5.4 to 9.5.2
Date: 2016-09-20 05:04:06
Message-ID: 0118f944-7b19-9438-1668-bceafafd21e7@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 09/19/2016 09:43 PM, Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
> It is binary compatible, so yes. But trust me, there is problem with the
> new version.

Just to be clear did you mean:

"But trust me, there is problem with the new version."

Or

But trust me, there is no problem with the new version.

>
> On 20 September 2016 06:00:59 CEST, KGA Official
> <kga(dot)official(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> We are currently running at 9.5.2 and plan to upgrade to 9.5.4, but
> our change requirement needs to plan for a downgrade with data
> preservation, before upgrade is authorized.
>
> Thus, I am asking this: Is it safe to downgrade from 9.5.4 to 9.5.2
> by simply replacing the binaries? We will keep the data folder same.
>
> Thx!
>
>
> --
> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail
> gesendet.

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Venkata B Nagothi 2016-09-20 06:02:11 Re: We have a requirement to downgrade from PostgreSQL 9.5.4 to 9.5.2
Previous Message Patrick B 2016-09-20 04:57:03 Re: FATAL: could not receive data from WAL stream