From: | "Anibal David Acosta" <aa(at)devshock(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Claudio Freire'" <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, "'Jeff Janes'" <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: how to avoid deadlock on masive update with multiples delete |
Date: | 2012-10-05 18:33:49 |
Message-ID: | 011201cda327$f99d73b0$ecd85b10$@devshock.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Process 1 (massive update): update table A set column1=0, column2=0
Process 2 (multiple delete): perform delete_row(user_name, column1, column2)
from table A where user_name=YYY
The pgsql function delete_row delete the row and do other business logic not
related to table A.
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Claudio Freire [mailto:klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com]
Enviado el: viernes, 05 de octubre de 2012 10:27 a.m.
Para: Jeff Janes
CC: Anibal David Acosta; pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Asunto: Re: [PERFORM] how to avoid deadlock on masive update with multiples
delete
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The bulk update could take an Exclusive (not Access Exclusive) lock.
> Or the delete could perhaps be arranged to delete the records in ctid
> order (although that might still deadlock). Or you could just repeat
> the failed transaction.
How do you make pg update/delete records, in bulk, in some particular order?
(ie, without issuing separate queries for each record)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | virag | 2012-10-07 13:49:23 | UPDATE execution time is increasing |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2012-10-05 16:33:53 | Re: how to avoid deadlock on masive update with multiples delete |