From: | SZŰCS Gábor <surrano(at)mailbox(dot)hu> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Delayed result from another connection |
Date: | 2004-11-05 13:29:30 |
Message-ID: | 011201c4c33b$7bd722c0$0403a8c0@fejleszt4 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-sql |
Dear Tom,
Thanks for the explanation, it's more than enough. Some more questions if
you don't mind:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 6:46 PM
> =?iso-8859-2?B?U1rbQ1MgR+Fib3I=?= <surrano(at)mailbox(dot)hu> writes:
> > The php connects to the database and updates retval where id=seq.
> > It seems to be OK, but the function returns the value of
php_retval.retval
> > _before_ the call.
>
> Yes, because your transaction is working with a database snapshot that
> predates the other transaction run by the separate PHP connection.
Yes, but the snapshot is not constant during a transaction, right? (as my
example showed this clearly) ...
> Prior to PG 8.0, new snapshots are not taken between commands of a
function,
> even in READ COMMITTED mode. You could get the behavior you want by
> issuing separate interactive commands instead of wrapping the sequence
> in a function.
... So if I understood you correctly, it's the function call that sees the
old snapshot, and the transaction is more flexible in this issue. right?
> > I thought it's something about "35.2 Visibility of Data Changes", but
that's
> > only for triggers, isn't it?
>
> Nope.
I felt like it's not only for triggers but interpreted the doc as it'd be
only for triggers... Having a closer look, discovered that there is another
section with this title: "41.4 Visibility of Data Changes" ;)
> This has been a sore spot for a long time, but we didn't get consensus
> about changing it till recently ...
I assume there is no point in begging for a backport... ;)
Thanks again,
G.
%----------------------- cut here -----------------------%
\end
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Luiz K. Matsumura | 2004-11-05 14:52:35 | Re: Bug in pgAdminIII or in pg 8 beta3 ? |
Previous Message | Markus Bertheau | 2004-11-05 10:56:31 | pg_ctl telling only half the truth |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Flavio Fonseca | 2004-11-05 14:34:30 | sql problem |
Previous Message | Mischa Sandberg | 2004-11-05 03:27:44 | Re: CREATE TRIGGER ... FOR EACH STATEMENT |