From: | "Mitch Vincent" <mitch(at)doot(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
Date: | 2002-01-21 20:47:04 |
Message-ID: | 011201c1a2bc$c99633e0$0200000a@Mitch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Sorry for adding to this already long (and previously discussed) thread but
I don't see much need in justifying the BSD license, just say "Hey, it's
what we've had, we like it and we don't want to change it Thanks very much
for your opinion but it's been discussed and the decision to stay with the
BSD license has been made"
There we go! PostgreSQL developers (and users) don't need to answer to
anyone in my opinion and I think the statement should reflect that in the
nicest way possible.. Just a "thanks but no thanks" in the FAQ and add a
note asking people to please not bring it up again :-)
*deposits $0.02*
-Mitch
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mitch Vincent | 2002-01-21 20:50:27 | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
Previous Message | Ned Wolpert | 2002-01-21 20:46:52 | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mitch Vincent | 2002-01-21 20:50:27 | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
Previous Message | Ned Wolpert | 2002-01-21 20:46:52 | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |