Re: Proposal for updatable views

From: "William ZHANG" <uniware(at)zedware(dot)org>
To: "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal for updatable views
Date: 2006-03-14 07:13:16
Message-ID: 010d01c64736$d378c030$1504a8c0@devserver.kingbase.com.cn
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> A quick look at the grammar suggests that the key problem is the
> opt_timezone production --- it might be that if we removed that in
> favor of spelling out the alternatives at the call sites, the conflict
> would go away. bison-fu is all about postponing shift/reduce decisions
> until you've seen enough to be sure ...
>
> regards, tom lane

Yes, if we can change opt_timezone and related production rules,
it is a better choice.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-03-14 08:18:51 Re: Proposal for updatable views
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-03-14 06:40:03 Re: Proposal for updatable views