| From: | Mark kirkwood <markir(at)slingshot(dot)co(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | monty(at)mysql(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re :MySQL Benchmark page - Problem with vacuum() in PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2001-08-16 08:27:07 |
| Message-ID: | 01081620270801.01095@spikey.slithery.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Dear all,
Please humour me if this is a silly comment , or has been made before -
but....
when Monty posted the original message I had a few thoughts - ........
I understand that there is a issue with
loop many times
perform a set a updates/inserts
run vauuum
end loop
I would not peform a test this way.... let Postgresql MVCC sort out the
relevant rows to manage... so run vacuum once only....after all on a real
system you try to minimize the number of times vacuum ( or its related
equivalents in other dbms's - e.g : analyze ) are run ( as they are typically
expensive ).
So I guess I am saying that if the Benchmark requires multiple runs of vacuum
/ analyze type functions then maybe the design of the benchmark should be
examined a bit...
regards
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kenji Sugita | 2001-08-16 08:34:01 | The -o command line option of pg_dump for a database using foreign keys |
| Previous Message | Karel Zak | 2001-08-16 08:02:00 | Re: Storing images in PG? |