Re: psql -l

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, will trillich <will(at)serensoft(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql -l
Date: 2001-07-18 22:16:27
Message-ID: 0107181816270A.00973@lowen.wgcr.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Wednesday 18 July 2001 18:03, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The strange part is that we are running around trying to figure out if
> it is a bug and no one knows that Debian has modified it.

While I understand Oliver's reasons for having the Debian stuff on the debian
server, I believe it would be appropriate to have the patchfile and the
various Debian README's available on the main postgresql site.

It was a hunch that sent me looking there -- I had read the Debian patchfile
before (about the 'peer' authentication deal), and apparently my subconscious
picked up on it.

> The Red Hat stuff isn't a problem because you recoginize it as such.

The RPM has a rather distinctive footprint, yes....
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

  • Re: psql -l at 2001-07-18 22:03:26 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Manock 2001-07-18 22:28:08 Re: replication?
Previous Message David Wright 2001-07-18 22:13:22 conditional INSERTs

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-07-18 22:26:32 Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-07-18 22:10:36 Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)