Re: psql -l

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, will trillich <will(at)serensoft(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql -l
Date: 2001-07-18 21:38:09
Message-ID: 01071817380907.00973@lowen.wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Wednesday 18 July 2001 16:30, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> What is not appropriate is that we are getting error reports for
> programs we didn't write!

Which is why I believe that Red Hat's 'relabeling' is a Good Thing -- _they_
will get bug reports for 'Red Hat Database' -- then _they_ can contact the
hackers list after verifying that it isn't their 'modifications' causing the
problem.

I really try to make the RPM's patching minimal -- directory paths, a README,
migration helper scripts, and the initscript are the only 'enhancements' I
provide. And I try to field any reports I see on the list....

However, Oliver is a part of 'we' isn't he?

> [ Much pontificating skipped.]

Interesting choice of words.... I wasn't intending to sound authoritarian....
or religious. Sorry if I did sound pontifical.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

  • Re: psql -l at 2001-07-18 20:30:04 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

  • Re: psql -l at 2001-07-18 22:03:26 from Bruce Momjian

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-07-18 21:44:23 Re: slow SELECT ... LIMIT query
Previous Message Ryan Mahoney 2001-07-18 21:33:30 Re: replication?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-07-18 22:03:26 Re: psql -l
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2001-07-18 21:35:59 Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)