| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Keith F Irwin <kirwin14(at)home(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql & Python 2 |
| Date: | 2001-07-13 19:04:32 |
| Message-ID: | 01071315043202.00944@lowen.wgcr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Friday 13 July 2001 14:47, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Lamar Owen writes:
> > But I will reiterate that the prebuilt binary RPMs are built for _stock_
> > RedHat (and hopefully the systems used to build the non-RedHat binaries
> > are stock, as well).
> Maybe the directory naming on the ftp site should indicate this. For
> instance, I see v7.1-Mandrake, that's clear. But what about the rest
> (could be the question of a user)?
Currently the tree is:
/pub/binary/v7.1.2/RPMS/SRPMS
/pub/binary/v7.1.2/RPMS/redhat-7.0
/pub/binary/v7.1.2/RPMS/redhat-6.2
/pub/binary/v7.1.2/RPMS/mandrake-8.0
/pub/binary/v7.1.2/RPMS/redhat-7.1
/pub/binary/v7.1.2/RPMS/mandrake-7.2
/pub/binary/v7.1.2/RPMS/mandrake-7.1
Is there improvement yet to be made? Is my structure 'upside-down'
(actually, this is the structure Marc started me on.....and I have
continued....)?
--
Lamar Owen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | eddie iannuccelli | 2001-07-13 19:51:01 | Re: Outer joins |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2001-07-13 19:04:23 | Re: Nusphere/MySQL-AB arguing |