Re: Any time estimates for 7.1.2 RPM's ?

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Any time estimates for 7.1.2 RPM's ?
Date: 2001-06-07 15:40:15
Message-ID: 01060711401504.01157@lowen.wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 07 June 2001 11:24, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> I have had bad experience upgrading rpm package a few times (the rpm
> database
> getting whacked and all subsequent installs claiming some packages to be
> missing)
> so I'd rather avoid upgrading unless I absolutely have to.

Well,the upgrade to 3.0.5 isn't a problem. Personally, I won't upgrade my
6.2 box to RPM4 -- but that is a personal choice having a lot to do with the
RPM release of PostgreSQL built on this machine.

Upgrading to 3.0.5 should be completely painless. You do need the new
'rpm-build' package, though, or you won't be able to rebuild.
- --
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7H6Bi5kGGI8vV9eERAveXAJ9gmYsSYas4/CGVucJdl+BYEKEUjACeOCNW
47lMVY1Hjv5SFW0tp4MMBqg=
=kTbh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2001-06-07 15:53:21 Re: behavior of ' = NULL' vs. MySQL vs. Standards
Previous Message Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= 2001-06-07 15:33:15 Re: Any time estimates for 7.1.2 RPM's ?