From: | "Munteanu Gabriel" <gmunteanu(at)rdslink(dot)ro> |
---|---|
To: | "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | "postgres-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: wal-debug |
Date: | 2003-03-03 22:36:21 |
Message-ID: | 010601c2e1d5$50cc5fd0$4b5ae73e@SERVERXP |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
ok, Thanx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: "Munteanu Gabriel" <gmunteanu(at)rdslink(dot)ro>
Cc: "postgres-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] wal-debug
[snip]
Well, it can disperse the writes so they are spread more efficiently, but
yes
it can be more writes.
> I am not doing something specially, I want to increase performance, that's
> all.
>
> and wanted to disable WAL.
Well, you can't disable WAL. But since you don't mind the stability of your
data you could just get an older version (pre-WAL) say 7.0 or 7.1.
You can also turn off fsync. Then it might disappear from your disk cache
instead of being written. Either way you're putting your data at risk.
--
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Patrick Bye (WFF) | 2003-03-03 22:38:33 | Help with functions (Never mind) |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2003-03-03 22:28:39 | Re: wal-debug |