From: | Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)webline(dot)dk> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem |
Date: | 2001-05-19 08:38:29 |
Message-ID: | 01051910382902.14217@bering |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Second: if VACUUM can run in the background, then there's no reason not
> to run it fairly frequently. In fact, it could become an automatically
> scheduled activity like CHECKPOINT is now, or perhaps even a continuously
> running daemon (which was the original conception of it at Berkeley, BTW).
Maybe it's obvious, but I'd like to mention that you need some way of setting
priority. If it's a daemon, or a process, you an nice it. If not, you need to
implement something by yourself.
--
Kaare Rasmussen --Linux, spil,-- Tlf: 3816 2582
Kaki Data tshirts, merchandize Fax: 3816 2501
Howitzvej 75 Åben 14.00-18.00 Web: www.suse.dk
2000 Frederiksberg Lørdag 11.00-17.00 Email: kar(at)webline(dot)dk
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-05-19 09:02:23 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/backend/uti ... |
Previous Message | Klaus Reger | 2001-05-19 08:20:36 | Re: Grammar-problems with pl/pgsql in gram.y |