From: | Martín Marqués <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> |
---|---|
To: | Dariusz Pietrzak <dariush(at)ajax(dot)umcs(dot)lublin(dot)pl>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Permissions and views. |
Date: | 2001-05-07 05:55:30 |
Message-ID: | 01050708553000.17471@bugs |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Lun 07 May 2001 11:29, you wrote:
> > What PG version is this?
>
> 7.0.2
>
> It is said that RULES are executed with rule's owner permissions, so how
> is it possible that different users are getting different results?
This is not true. Rules are not executed with owner permission. The
permission needed is over the relation on which the
SELECT/INSERT/DELETE/UPDATE has been executed.
An example: If you have permission to read (SELECT) on a table, the rule over
that table, ON select will be executed, else NOT.
Saludos... :-)
P.D.: Check views and rules for more info.
--
El mejor sistema operativo es aquel que te da de comer.
Cuida tu dieta.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Marques | mmarques(at)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar
Programador, Administrador | Centro de Telematica
Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jorge Escalante | 2001-05-07 08:26:17 | Nu-B question |
Previous Message | Mitch Vincent | 2001-05-07 03:45:27 | Re: Is this expected? (Index scanning) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-05-07 08:12:32 | Re: TABLE RENAME/NUMERIC FILENAMES (Was: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems) |
Previous Message | mlw | 2001-05-06 20:47:52 | Re: File system performance and pg_xlog (More info) |