| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Vadim Mikheev <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0. |
| Date: | 2001-03-21 00:25:24 |
| Message-ID: | 01032019304006.14753@lowen |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> This will not be RC1 :-(
> 'Ive already gotten a
> couple occurrences of Lamar's failure.
Well, I was at least hoping it was a problem here -- particularly since I
haven't been able to reproduce it. But, since it is not a local problem, I'm
glad I caught it -- on the first regression test run, no less. I've run a
dozen tests since without duplication.
Although, like you, Tom, I'm curious as to why it hadn't showed up before -- is
the fact that this is a slow machine a factor, possibly?
Although I am now much more leery of our regression suite -- this issue isn't
even tested, in reality. Do we have _any_ WAL-related tests? The parallel
testing is a good thing -- but I wonder what boundary conditions aren't getting
tested.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-21 00:32:56 | Re: pg_inherits: not found, but visible |
| Previous Message | Roberto Mello | 2001-03-21 00:23:24 | Re: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ... |