Re: database died

From: "Martin A(dot) Marques" <martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: database died
Date: 2001-03-14 21:11:01
Message-ID: 01031418110100.02453@math.unl.edu.ar
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

El Mié 14 Mar 2001 12:02, Tom Lane escribió:
> "Martin A. Marques" <martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> writes:
> > CheckPoint Data Base: fork failed: Not enough space
> > [ whereupon postmaster quits ]
> >
> > Any idea on this? I think the the postmaster shouldn't die, at least it's
> > what I first thought.
>
> I agree. Dying if the startup subjob fails is one thing, but dying
> because a routine checkpoint fails is another. The code is treating
> those two cases alike however ... will change it.

Just happend again. At this moment the postgres on that machine is not in
production, but should be in a short future. Is there a chance of getting
some kind of patch, or maybe changing some configuratin parameters of the OS
or the postmaster?
I'm getting to feel the pain on the back that one can get with Solaris.

Thanks for the feed back.

Saludos... :-)

--
System Administration: It's a dirty job,
but someone told I had to do it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués email: martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar
Santa Fe - Argentina http://math.unl.edu.ar/~martin/
Administrador de sistemas en math.unl.edu.ar
-----------------------------------------------------------------

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-14 22:10:34 Re: Re: database died
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-14 19:28:33 Re: pgmonitor patch for query string