| From: | Andrew Rawnsley <ronz(at)ravensfield(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "PostgreSQL [GENERAL]" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | 'Exotic' Features |
| Date: | 2001-03-12 02:04:52 |
| Message-ID: | 01031121045200.17294@coho.ravensfield.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Anybody on the development side care to comment on the 'exotic' features in
the to-do list? Specifically the querying-across databases feature? Way
exotic? Not-so-exotic-but-no-one-has-the-time? Would-have-to-
re-plumb the entire database engine type of exotic?
Portability with 'standard' commercial DBs is difficult without even being
able to fake this (i.e. having the parser drop the schema name in a query at
the least). I would drop Oracle like a skunked beer if I could get over this
hurdle...
--
Regards,
Andrew Rawnsley
Ravensfield Geographic Resources, Ltd.
(740) 587-0114
www.ravensfield.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | datactrl | 2001-03-12 02:12:16 | psql win32 version? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-12 01:48:21 | Re: Data type for storing images? |