| From: | Mario Weilguni <Mario(dot)Weilguni(at)kpnqwest(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Implementing an operator in C? | 
| Date: | 2001-02-05 18:04:38 | 
| Message-ID: | 01020519043801.01393@wotan | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
Am Sonntag,  4. Februar 2001 20:12 schrieben Sie:
> Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com> writes:
> >           float8 num3 = numeric_float8(num1);
>
> That won't work in the brave new world of 7.1 :-(.  You need to do
> something like
>
> 	float8 num3 = DatumGetFloat8(DirectFunctionCall1(numeric_float8,
> 					NumericGetDatum(num1)));
>
> Ugly, I know ... but we have to be rigidly careful about converting
> values to Datum and back in order to avoid portability problems.
>
> A decent C compiler should've warned about type mismatches in your call,
> BTW.
>
> 			regards, tom lane
Thanks alot for the info, but the problem is elsewhere. Even a simple 
function like
Datum
nef(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
         Numeric                 num1 = PG_GETARG_NUMERIC(0);
         PG_RETURN_BOOL(true);
}
will crash. The macro PG_GETARG_NUMERIC evaluates to:
((Numeric)pg_detoast_datum((struct varlena *) ((Pointer) ( (fcinfo->arg[0])))
and this pg_detoast_datum will lead to a crash (SIGSEGV). So I think I must 
be doing something wrong here, isn't it?
Thanks!
Best regards,
         Mario Weilguni
-- 
===================================================
 Mario Weilguni                               KPNQwest Austria GmbH
 Senior Engineer Web Solutions                         Nikolaiplatz 4
 tel: +43-316-813824                                8020 graz, austria
 fax: +43-316-813824-26                    http://www.kpnqwest.at
 e-mail: mario(dot)weilguni(at)kpnqwest(dot)com
===================================================
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mathieu Dube | 2001-02-05 18:18:48 | Re: Re: 1024 limits?? | 
| Previous Message | Mitch Vincent | 2001-02-05 18:00:44 | Re: Like vs '=' |