From: | "Robert B(dot) Easter" <reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Outer Joins |
Date: | 2001-01-07 19:07:20 |
Message-ID: | 0101071407201E.09559@comptechnews |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sunday 07 January 2001 13:13, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Robert B. Easter" <reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com> writes:
> > UNION JOIN is deprecated
>
> Oh? By whom?
>
> The reason 7.1 doesn't have it is I didn't have time for it, not that
> we don't plan to do it ever.
I read it in the SQL spec. ANSI/ISO 9075-2 1999 (final).
Annex D
(informative)
Deprecated features
It is intended that the following features will be removed at a
later date from a revised version of this part of ISO/IEC 9075:
1) The ability to specify UNION JOIN in a <joined table> has been
deprecated.
It's the only one. I sent a patch to the patches list for JOIN
documentation. In it, the only thing I said about UNION JOIN is
"Deprecated." Let me know if I should change that. I thought about omitting
it entirely.
--
-------- Robert B. Easter reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com ---------
-- CompTechNews Message Board http://www.comptechnews.com/ --
-- CompTechServ Tech Services http://www.comptechserv.com/ --
---------- http://www.comptechnews.com/~reaster/ ------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Harding | 2001-01-07 19:14:05 | Re: Loading optimization |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-07 19:06:07 | Re: Outer Joins |