From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Postgresql Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers-win32" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] initdb |
Date: | 2003-10-10 02:03:47 |
Message-ID: | 010101c38ed2$be7cc470$6401a8c0@DUNSLANE |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
There will be a new version out there soon. When I am happy with it I will
let you know - right now I am dealing with 2 issues - setlocale(LC_ALL,"")
doesn't read from the environment on Windows, and the program is possibly
not picking up the buffers/connections properly.
Please don't put the version currently out there in CVS - the files won't
even be the same - initdb-scripts.h will disappear and there will be a new
file called "system_views.sql".
There is no urgency about this - until we have a working postgres executable
on Windows initdb is useless anyway. My aim has been to have initdb ready
when postgres is ready. Of course, I test against Unix all the time to make
sure nothing gets broken.
cheers
andrew
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Postgresql Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>;
"pgsql-hackers-win32" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] initdb
>
> I have added this URL to the Win32 page, and removed the "initdb C" TODO
> item. Great job. Do you wantt this in Win32 CVS or should we just wait
> for 7.5 to start?
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> > Excellent idea.
> >
> > Here's the URL: http://www.dunslane.net/~andrew/Initdb_In_C.html
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > andrew
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> >
> > > Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > > > I now have a C implementation of initdb, ...
> > > > There's a little work still to go (see below), but I'd appreciate
some
> > > > eyeballs on it to see if I have made any major booboos, or could
have
> > > > done things better. What's the best way to proceed?
> > >
> > > Put it on a web page and post the link, or if you don't have a
website,
> > > send it to pgsql-patches (clearly marked as "not ready to apply").
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org
> >
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
> + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania
19073
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-10 02:07:42 | Re: [HACKERS] initdb |
Previous Message | Claudio Natoli | 2003-10-10 01:54:29 | Re: [HACKERS] initdb |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-10 02:07:42 | Re: [HACKERS] initdb |
Previous Message | Claudio Natoli | 2003-10-10 01:54:29 | Re: [HACKERS] initdb |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-10 02:07:42 | Re: [HACKERS] initdb |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-10 01:39:13 | Re: [HACKERS] initdb |