From: | "Anibal David Acosta" <aa(at)devshock(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Kevin Grittner'" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, "'Richard Huxton'" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, "'Sergey Konoplev'" <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'Stephen Frost'" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: unlogged tables |
Date: | 2011-11-14 17:38:31 |
Message-ID: | 00ff01cca2f4$3cb86860$b6293920$@devshock.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
I am doing asynchronous commit but sometimes I think that there are so many
"things" in an insert/update transaction, for a table that has not too much
important information.
My table is a statistics counters table, so I can live with a partial data
loss, but not with a full data loss because many counters are weekly and
monthly.
Unlogged table can increase speed, this table has about 1.6 millions of
update per hour, but unlogged with a chance of loss all information on a
crash are not a good idea for this.
Anyway, thanks Kevin!
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Kevin Grittner [mailto:Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov]
Enviado el: lunes, 14 de noviembre de 2011 02:27 p.m.
Para: 'Richard Huxton'; Anibal David Acosta; 'Sergey Konoplev'
CC: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org; 'Stephen Frost'
Asunto: Re: [PERFORM] unlogged tables
"Anibal David Acosta" <aa(at)devshock(dot)com> wrote:
> Maybe an option like "Recover from file " will be useful So, for
> example, daily some process do a COPY of entire table to a file
>
> In case of crash postgres recover content from the file.
If you need to recover file contents on a crash, then an unlogged table is
probably not the right choice. There is always asynchronous commit.
-Kevin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-11-14 17:50:25 | Re: unlogged tables |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-11-14 17:26:32 | Re: unlogged tables |