| From: | "Alain TESIO" <tesio(at)easynet(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | "^chewie" <chewie(at)wookimus(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "PGSQL Bugs" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: -F option |
| Date: | 2000-01-10 05:35:05 |
| Message-ID: | 00fc01bf5b2c$75d75c40$d15f72c3@atesio |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
> Alain, have you run postgreSQL with the -F option and compared them then?
> I'd venture to say that if you did so, you'ld find PostgreSQL a bit more
> desireable on the speed factor. Just remember, when you do so, you loose
> some recovery possibilities -- as you're relying on the OS to sync data
> from memory to disc.
Hello,
I've often experienced crashes with the -F option, the script which fills my
database can never run completely. If any developper is interested, I have
a dump file (about 2 Mo gzipped, directly produced from pg_dump) which
is crashing on a create index with the option -F set, and is working fine
without it.
My configuration is : Linux RedHat 6.0, Kernel 2.2-15, PostgreSQL 6.5.3,
64 Mo RAM.
Alain
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-10 06:17:00 | Re: [BUGS] Re: -F option |
| Previous Message | HEALTH&MONEY$!!! | 2000-01-08 15:17:03 | MAKE MONEY AT HOME |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-10 06:17:00 | Re: [BUGS] Re: -F option |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-10 04:35:40 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] Searching http://www.postgresql.org ... |