From: | "Steve Wolfe" <steve(at)iboats(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Replication Server? IS: Zend comparison chart |
Date: | 2001-06-07 17:09:05 |
Message-ID: | 00f601c0ef74$ac6f6440$50824e40@iboats.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> > > The database article at Zend mentioned a replication server for
> > > PostgreSQL., available at www.pgsql.com. The press release says the
code
> > > itself has been put into the CVS tree, but I can't find any
documentation
> > > on it anywhere.
>
> The article at Zend also stated that PostgreSQL could handle 1000
> transactions a second with 100 users. This is funny, since my postgresql
> server (7.1.2) running on a PII 533 with SCSI and 256 mb RAM (HP Server)
> can't even handle 1000 select statements per second. Not even close.
"transactions per second" does not equate to "real-world queries per
second". : )
When we were sizing out a machine, a Compaq rep came in and asked how
many queries we did in a day, and he told us that a single CPU alpha could
handle about ten times that many "transactions per second". The machine
we have now is a lot faster than a single Alpha, and is getting
overloaded.
steve
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nick Ganju | 2001-06-07 17:36:32 | A join that should be very fast is taking a long time |
Previous Message | Alex Pilosov | 2001-06-07 16:46:15 | Re: [HACKERS] something smells bad |