From: | "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Gary MacDougall" <gary(at)freeportweb(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Matthew" <matt(at)ctlno(dot)com>, "'Alfred Perlstein '" <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: cygwin gcc problem. |
Date: | 2000-11-12 18:22:30 |
Message-ID: | 00f101c04cd5$85167380$0705a8c0@jecw2k1 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I can't remember now where I found this, but I followed the instructions
here --
http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/postgres/portNT.html -- to the letter just
last night and was successful in getting PostgreSQL running on my W2K
laptop. As mentioned below, I selected Unix file type for the CYGWIN
installation. I haven't played too much with it yet, but I was able to
create a new database and load a database dump from a RedHat machine.
Hope this helps,
Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary MacDougall" <gary(at)freeportweb(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Matthew" <matt(at)ctlno(dot)com>; "'Alfred Perlstein '" <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cygwin gcc problem.
> Still no luck with this. I'm at a loss.
>
> Has ANYONE been able to compile PostgreSQL on Windows 2000
> with the CYGWIN package? If so, I'd be glad to know what steps
> were taken to accomplish this.
> I tried Matthew's suggestions, but that didn't seem to make a difference.
> I'm starting to wonder now if I've got a buggy CYGWIN...
>
> My goal here is to have a decent PostgresSQL distribution for W2K, which
> of course I'll make available in Installation form. However, if I can't
get
> this sucker going, its not going to happen.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Gary
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthew" <matt(at)ctlno(dot)com>
> To: "'Alfred Perlstein '" <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>; "'Gary MacDougall '"
> <gary(at)freeportweb(dot)com>
> Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 1:29 PM
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] cygwin gcc problem.
>
>
> > I sucessfully compiled 7.0.2 on Win 2000 recently. I had a lot of
> problems
> > when I first installed cygwin and I select default text type of DOS.
When
> i
> > removed cygwin, and changed that option during install it all worked
(I'm
> > not sure if I swited it from DOS to Unix, or from Unix to DOS). I'm not
> > sure that's the problem you are having but it helped me.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alfred Perlstein
> > To: Gary MacDougall
> > Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Sent: 11/11/00 1:31 PM
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cygwin gcc problem.
> >
> > * Gary MacDougall <gary(at)freeportweb(dot)com> [001111 11:28] wrote:
> > > I'm trying to compile postgresql on Windows 2000. I've followed the
> > directions accordingly.
> > >
> > > When I run the "configure" script, and I get the following error
> > message:
> > >
> > >
> > > configure: error installation or configuration problem: C compiler
> > cannot creat
> > > e executables.
> > >
> > > If anyone has any clues, I'd greatly appreciate the assistance.
> >
> > I think you need to ask on the cygwin lists. If you're compiling
> > this on Windows 2000 you already need a compiler to compile it.
> >
> > I would just find the binary distribution and install that.
> >
> > -Alfred
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2000-11-12 20:01:22 | Re: Syslog Facility Patch |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-11-12 18:22:15 | Re: Syslog Facility Patch |