| From: | "mark" <dvlhntr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Toby Corkindale'" <toby(dot)corkindale(at)strategicdata(dot)com(dot)au>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: Re: SSDD reliability |
| Date: | 2011-05-19 00:50:28 |
| Message-ID: | 00ec01cc15be$c0c75440$4255fcc0$@com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Note 1:
> I have seen an array that was powered on continuously for about six
> years, which killed half the disks when it was finally powered down,
> left to cool for a few hours, then started up again.
>
Recently we rebooted about 6 machines that had uptimes of 950+ days.
Last time fsck had run on the file systems was 2006.
When stuff gets that old, has been on-line and under heavy load all that
time you actually get paranoid about reboots. In my newly reaffirmed
opinion, at that stage reboots are at best a crap shoot. We lost several
hours to that gamble more than we had budgeted for. HP is getting more of
their gear back than in a usual month.
Maybe that is just life with HP.
-M
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martin Gainty | 2011-05-19 00:57:19 | Re: SSDD reliability |
| Previous Message | Geoffrey Becker | 2011-05-19 00:40:55 | Connecting to Postgres using Windows 7 |