From: | "Gevik Babakhani" <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | "'Alvaro Herrera'" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'PGSQL Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL network discovery |
Date: | 2008-10-29 20:04:27 |
Message-ID: | 00e401c93a01$8c889770$0a01a8c0@gevmus |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I asked this question because I have a situation where a service like this
would be very useful. If such a functionality would be accepted by the core
team, I am willing to work on it.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 8:50 PM
> To: Gevik Babakhani
> Cc: 'PGSQL Hackers'
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL network discovery
>
> Gevik Babakhani wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is a nice little feature within MSSQL where it is possible to
> > enumerate all MSSQL servers on the local network.
> > I wonder how this can be made possible with PG. Pinging every
> > IP:PGPORT within the current subnet is one of the options
> but I guess
> > that would be just a bad solution. Any thoughts?
>
> We have rendezvous support too. We need to update it to use
> the newer Avahi library, but the one person who proposed
> using the thread interface got scolded for that and fled :-)
> The interface we'd need to use is complex and the patch would
> be a lot bigger.
>
> If you want to work on it, you're welcome to do so :-)
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera
> http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2008-10-29 20:08:29 | Re: minimal update |
Previous Message | Gevik Babakhani | 2008-10-29 20:00:27 | Re: PostgreSQL network discovery |