From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Heikki Linnakangas'" <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
Cc: | <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'Andres Freund'" <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Patch for option in pg_resetxlog for restore from WAL files |
Date: | 2012-09-24 10:44:28 |
Message-ID: | 00cf01cd9a41$93315d10$b9941730$@kapila@huawei.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Monday, September 24, 2012 2:30 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 18.07.2012 16:47, Amit kapila wrote:
> > Patch implementing the design in below mail chain is attached with
> this mail.
>
> This patch copies the ReadRecord() function and a bunch of related
> functions from xlog.c into pg_resetxlog.c. There's a separate patch in
> the current commitfest to make that code reusable, without having to
> copy-paste it to every tool that wants to parse the WAL. See
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=860. This patch
> should be refactored to make use of that framework, as soon as it's
> committed.
Sure. Thanks for the feedback.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit kapila | 2012-09-24 10:57:02 | Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation |
Previous Message | Nozomi Anzai | 2012-09-24 09:42:18 | Re: 64-bit API for large object |